Southampton expelled from play-offs: Saints chief executive describes ‘spygate’ punishment as ‘manifestly disproportionate’ to the offence | Football News

Southampton have claimed their expulsion from the Championship play-off final is unacceptable despite admitting to breaching EFL regulations over the ‘spygate’ scandal.

On Tuesday evening, the Saints were expelled from the Championship play-offs, with Middlesbrough reinstated, after a member of their backroom staff was caught watching Boro’s training ahead of the first leg of their play-off semi-final.

According to the EFL, Southampton admitted “multiple breaches” relating to the unauthorised filming of their opponents’ training ahead of games against Oxford and Ipswich, as well as the clash with Middlesbrough.

In addition, Southampton were handed a four-point deduction for next season. They have submitted an appeal, which will be heard on Wednesday, and the EFL has acknowledged this could result in a further change to Saturday’s fixture, which is now scheduled to see Hull City take on Middlesbrough.

Southampton chief executive Phil Parsons has now released a statement, admitting fault but also arguing that the ruling is “manifestly disproportionate” to the offence.

“We have appealed yesterday’s decision by the Independent Disciplinary Commission to expel Southampton Football Club from the Sky Bet Championship Play-Offs, and to impose a four-point deduction for the 2026/27 season,” the statement issued at 2pm on Wednesday read.

“Before turning to that appeal, I want to address our supporters, our players, and the wider football community directly and without equivocation.

“What happened was wrong. The club has admitted breaches of EFL Regulations 3.4 and 127. We are sorry to the other clubs involved, and most of all to the Southampton supporters whose extraordinary loyalty and support this season deserved better from the club.

“We have provided our full co-operation to the EFL’s investigation and disciplinary process. Following the appeal, we will also be writing to the EFL to volunteer our participation in a working group on the practical application and enforcement of Regulation 127 across the Championship. Contrition without change is hollow, and we intend to demonstrate change.

“On the appeal itself: we accept that there should be a sanction. What we cannot accept is a sanction which bears no proportion to the offence. Whereas Leeds United was fined £200,000 for a similar offence, Southampton has been denied the opportunity to compete in a game worth more than £200m and one which means so much to our staff, players and supporters.

“We believe the financial consequence of yesterday’s ruling makes it, by a very considerable distance, the largest penalty ever imposed on an English football club. Luton Town’s 30-point deduction in 2008/09 – to date the most severe sporting sanction in the English game – was levied against a club already in League Two, with no comparable revenue at stake. Derby County’s 21-point deduction in 2021 cost them their Championship status. Everton’s eventual six-point deduction in 2023/24 followed losses of £124.5m, a figure dwarfed by what has been taken from Southampton in a single afternoon.

“The largest financial penalty ever levied by the Premier League, against Chelsea in March of this year, was £10.75m, and was accompanied by no sporting sanction whatsoever despite involving £47.5m in undisclosed payments over seven years.

“We say this not to minimise what occurred at this club, which we have accepted was wrong. We say it because proportionality is itself a principle of natural justice. The Commission was entitled to impose a sanction. It was not, we will argue, entitled to impose one that is manifestly disproportionate to every previous sanction in the history of the English game.

“Our appeal will be heard today, and we will provide a further update in due course.”

Why Southampton are confident about their appeal

Southampton’s appeal against the decision to throw them out of the Championship play-off final will be heard on Wednesday.

An independent commission made the bombshell ruling on Tuesday after Saints – according to the EFL – admitted to “multiple breaches” related to unauthorised filming of opponents’ training before matches.

Middlesbrough – who initially reported Saints when they alleged one of their staff members spied on a training session ahead of the play-off semi-finals – have been reinstated and, as it stands, will play Hull at Wembley on Saturday for a place in the Premier League.

However, the EFL has acknowledged the appeal’s outcome “could result in a further change to Saturday’s fixture”.

Sky Sports News reporter Mark McAdam said Saints are “shocked and flabbergasted” by the verdict.

“Southampton believe they will be successful upon appeal; however, there is a long day ahead,” McAdam said.

“There is a confidence inside the club that this will be overturned.

“Over the course of the last 24 hours, Southampton’s lawyers have been working throughout the course of the night to make sure they are fully prepared for the appeal.

“They will fight this robustly until the bitter end. You have to remember Southampton are appealing the punishment and not the crime in this situation.

“Southampton are appealing to an independent league arbitration panel. That is made up of three different members to those on the independent disciplinary commission which decided their initial sanction.

“Some might say this is a more senior panel at the meeting today to discuss what happened yesterday and Southampton’s appeal.”